Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the share income of minor married daughters admitted to the benefits of a partnership firm was assessable in the hands of their father under section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Section 16(3)(a)(ii) requires inclusion, in the computation of an individual's total income, of the income of a minor child arising from admission to the benefits of partnership in a firm of which the individual is a partner. Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, a minor cannot be a partner but may be admitted only to the benefits of partnership. The relevant income therefore fell within the statutory language of clause (a)(ii), and the circumstance that the daughters were married did not exclude the provision's operation.
Conclusion: The assessment of the share income of the minor married daughters in the hands of the assessee-father under section 16(3)(a)(ii) was valid.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue, and the inclusion of the minors' share income in the assessee's total income was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a minor is admitted to the benefits of partnership, the income arising from such admission is includible in the total income of the specified individual under the clubbing provision, and marital status does not defeat the operation of that provision.