We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic • Quick overview summary answering your query with references• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced • Includes everything in Basic • Detailed report covering: - Overview Summary - Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars] - Relevant Case Laws - Tariff / Classification / HSN - Expert views from TaxTMI - Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Committee of Creditors' Power Upheld in IRP Replacement & Fee Fixation The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, ruling that the replacement of the Interim Resolution ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Committee of Creditors' Power Upheld in IRP Replacement & Fee Fixation
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision, ruling that the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional by the Committee of Creditors is not justiciable. The Tribunal also affirmed the Committee's authority in fixing the fee for the Interim Resolution Professional, dismissing the appeal on both issues.
Issues: 1. Challenge to the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional. 2. Seeking payment of fee by the Interim Resolution Professional.
Replacement of Interim Resolution Professional: The Appellant, who was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional, approached the Adjudicating Authority under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking payment of fee and staying of his replacement. The Adjudicating Authority declined the prayer, stating that the wisdom of the Committee of Creditors is not subject to challenge. It was noted that the sole Financial Creditor had voted to replace the Resolution Professional under Section 22 of the I&B Code with 100% voting shares, while the requisite vote is 66%. The Tribunal emphasized that the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors, including the replacement of the Resolution Professional, is beyond the scope of judicial review and is non-justiciable.
Payment of Fee by Interim Resolution Professional: Regarding the issue of fee, the Adjudicating Authority correctly pointed out that the fee had been fixed by the Committee of Creditors at Rs. 50,000 under Regulation 33(3) of the IBBI. The Tribunal affirmed that the fee determination by the Committee of Creditors is not open to interference. Consequently, the Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the impugned order and declined to intervene. The appeal was dismissed without any costs being awarded.
In conclusion, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing that the replacement of the Interim Resolution Professional based on the Committee of Creditors' commercial wisdom is not subject to judicial review. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the Committee's authority in fixing the fee for the Interim Resolution Professional, thereby dismissing the appeal on both issues.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.