Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the execution and delivery of a deed of transfer of 20 shares by the vendor to the transferee amounted to a complete and binding transfer entitling the transferee to the rights and liabilities of ownership despite registration in the company's books not having been effected.
Analysis: A deed of transfer executed in the prescribed form was drawn up between the parties and handed to the transferee, and secondary evidence of that deed was admitted. Section 44 of Act VI of 1882 (corresponding to Section 28 of the Indian Companies Act, 1913) treats shares as movable property transferable in the manner provided by the company's articles. The articles allowed the company to decline registration and provided that the transferor remains on the register until substitution, but the company neither refused registration nor was given the opportunity to consider the transfer. The transferee's omission to present the deed promptly cannot be used to render the contract a nullity. The contract between vendor and transferee, evidenced by execution and delivery of the deed, is thus complete as between those parties and operates to vest beneficial ownership and attendant liabilities in the transferee.
Conclusion: The transfer contract was complete on execution and delivery of the deed; the transferee thereby became owner of the 20 shares with all rights and liabilities attached; plaintiffs are entitled to a decree for Rs. 80 as the price of the shares.