Reimbursement for revenue paid to protect an existing interest is available under Sections 69 and 70 of the Contract Act.

A person who, in good faith, pays government revenue arrears to protect an existing interest may seek reimbursement where the payment is made bona fide for that protective purpose. Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act applies if the payer has a real interest in preventing a sale that could affect that interest, even if the exposure is limited. Section 70 was also treated as wide enough to include payment of money, operating separately from Section 69 where a lawful act confers a benefit on another. The claim was likewise held sustainable under Section 9 of Act XI of 1859.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether a person who paid arrears of government revenue to protect his own interest could recover the amount under Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act; (ii) whether payment of money could fall within Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act; and (iii) whether the claim was also maintainable under Section 9 of Act XI of 1859.

Issue (i): whether a person who paid arrears of government revenue to protect his own interest could recover the amount under Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act.

Analysis: The respondents were bound to pay the revenue. The appellant, though not exposed to the same degree of risk as if the whole estate had been sold, had a real interest in preventing a sale that could affect his putni right. Section 69 applies where payment is made bona fide for the protection of one's own interest, and the existence of some interest is sufficient if the payer acts to protect it.

Conclusion: The claim was maintainable under Section 69 of the Indian Contract Act and this issue was decided in favour of the appellant.

Issue (ii): whether payment of money could fall within Section 70 of the Indian Contract Act.

Analysis: The expression used in Section 70 was held to be wide enough to include payment of money. The section was not treated as redundant by Section 69, because the two provisions operate in different situations: Section 69 covers payments made to protect one's own interest, while Section 70 covers cases where a lawful act is done and another person enjoys the benefit.

Conclusion: Section 70 applied to payment of money, and this issue was decided in favour of the appellant.

Issue (iii): whether the claim was also maintainable under Section 9 of Act XI of 1859.

Analysis: The right to recover did not depend on whether the money was first deposited or directly applied in liquidation of the arrears. Liability arose when the amount was credited towards the arrears, and the appellant had paid in good faith under a belief that his interest would be endangered by sale of the zamindari.

Conclusion: The claim was sustainable under Section 9 of Act XI of 1859 and this issue was decided in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The decisions of the lower Courts were set aside and the matter was sent back for determination of the remaining issue, with costs to follow the result.

Ratio Decidendi: A person who, in good faith, pays another's legally due revenue or arrears to protect his own existing interest may recover the amount where the payment was made for that protective purpose and the payer receives the benefit of the statutory reimbursement scheme.

---