1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Assessee in England not liable for Indian Income-tax on UK dividends</h1> The court ruled that the assessee, a resident of England, is not liable to be assessed for income derived from dividends paid by companies registered in ... - Issues:1. Assessment of income derived from dividends paid by companies registered in the United Kingdom but doing business in British India.2. Entitlement to a refund under Section 48 of the Indian Income-tax Act.3. Interpretation of the definition of 'total income' under the Act and eligibility for a refund.Analysis:1. The judgment addresses the issue of assessing income derived from dividends paid by companies registered in the United Kingdom but operating in British India. The court ruled that the assessee, a resident of England, is not liable to be assessed for such income. The dividends received by the assessee are considered a debt payable by an English debtor to an English creditor, not income accruing in British India. Therefore, the income is not liable to assessment under Section 4 of the Indian Income-tax Act.2. The judgment also discusses the entitlement to a refund under Section 48 of the Act. The court analyzed the conditions for claiming a refund, including the comparison of income-tax rates applicable to the company and the assessee's total income. It was established that the assessee, being a shareholder in a company, is eligible for a refund if the income-tax rate applicable to the company's profits is higher than the rate applicable to his total income. The court concluded that the assessee, having income assessable in India, is entitled to claim a refund.3. The interpretation of the definition of 'total income' under the Act was crucial in determining the eligibility for a refund. The court examined the provisions of Section 48(4) and clarified that for calculating a refund, the total income includes all income, profits, and gains from worldwide sources. In the case of the assessee, the total income comprised various sources, including dividends from Indian companies and interest earned in British India. The court concluded that the assessee, having income assessable under the Act, is entitled to a refund based on the difference in income-tax rates.Overall, the judgment provides a detailed analysis of the assessment of income derived from foreign dividends, eligibility for a refund under the Income-tax Act, and the interpretation of the definition of 'total income' for refund purposes. The court's decision emphasizes the application of relevant provisions and definitions to determine the assessee's tax liability and entitlement to a refund.