Inheritance rights upheld in zamindari share case, joint tenancy rejected. Appellant's appeal dismissed.

The court determined that the youngest wife and her son were granted an estate of inheritance in the zamindari share under the will of Raja Mokand Narain Deo. The High Court held that both had an equal interest in the two annas share, allowing alienation by sale or gift. The court affirmed this decision, rejecting the argument of joint tenancy under English law. It was ruled that the youngest wife had the power to alienate her share, and the appellant's appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded to the respondents.

---

---

Issues:
Construction of provisions in the will regarding the distribution of the estate between the elder son and the youngest wife and their son. Interpretation of the will's provisions regarding the four annas share of zamindari Silda. Validity of the mourasi mokurari potta granted by the youngest wife. Determination of the rights acquired under the will by the youngest wife and her son.

Analysis:
The judgment revolves around the interpretation of the will of Raja Mokand Narain Deo concerning the distribution of his estate between his elder son and his youngest wife and their son. The will aimed to prevent disputes among family members after the Raja's death. The will directed that the elder son would inherit the entire paternal estate, while the youngest wife and son were to receive villages for maintenance and a share of the zamindari of Silda. The will explicitly granted the youngest wife and son possession of the remaining four annas share of zamindari Silda for their maintenance. The dispute arose when the youngest wife, as the manager of her son's property, granted a perpetual potta of her share to third parties for a sum of money.

The primary issue before the court was to determine the nature of the interest granted to the youngest wife and her son under the will. The Subordinate Judge held that the youngest wife had a right of maintenance only, while the High Court reversed this decision, stating that both the son and the youngest wife had an equal interest in the two annas share. The Privy Council affirmed the High Court's decision, emphasizing that the terms of the will indicated an estate of inheritance for both recipients, allowing alienation by sale or gift. The court rejected the argument that the youngest wife and son were joint tenants under English law, emphasizing that such technicalities were not applicable to Hindu wills.

The court also addressed the validity of the potta granted by the youngest wife, ruling that she had the power to alienate her share. The judgment concluded by affirming the High Court's decision, dismissing the appeal, and ordering the appellant to pay the respondents' costs. The judgment clarified the rights acquired under the will by the youngest wife and her son, emphasizing the intent of the testator to grant them an estate of inheritance in the zamindari share.

---