Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether liquidation of the corporate debtor was to be ordered under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the resolution professional appointed as liquidator.
Analysis: The Committee of Creditors did not approve any resolution plan despite extensions and repeated opportunities. The resolution plan placed before it was rejected by an overwhelming majority, and the CIRP period had expired. In such circumstances, the statutory conditions for liquidation under Section 33 were satisfied. The decision of the Committee of Creditors on the commercial feasibility of the plan was treated as a commercial wisdom determination not open to interference. Consequential directions were also required regarding cessation of moratorium, appointment of the liquidator, investigation of the corporate debtor's affairs, and intimation to tax and regulatory authorities.
Conclusion: Liquidation was ordered and the resolution professional was appointed as liquidator.
Final Conclusion: The corporate insolvency resolution process ended in liquidation, with the existing resolution professional continuing as liquidator and the statutory liquidation regime made operative.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the Committee of Creditors rejects the resolution plan and the insolvency resolution period has expired, the adjudicating authority must order liquidation under Section 33 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.