Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The application was examined on the basis of Sections 8 and 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Limitation was held to run from the date when the right to apply accrued, namely the date of default or the last invoice giving rise to the claim, and not from later email correspondence or from the date of the demand notice. Since the last invoice was dated 02.06.2015 and the petition was filed on 12.03.2019, the application was beyond the three-year period prescribed under Article 137. The plea that limitation should run from the later email correspondence was rejected.
Conclusion: The application was barred by limitation and could not be entertained.
Ratio Decidendi: For an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, limitation under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 begins when the right to apply accrues, and a petition filed more than three years thereafter is barred unless delay is lawfully condoned.