Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Home Buyers Recognized as Financial Creditors, Initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Against Debtor.</h1> <h3>Pooja Kapoor and Ors. Versus Magic Info Solutions Private Limited</h3> The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, recognizing the Petitioners as Financial Creditors due to their status as Home Buyers. It ... Initiation of CIRP - default in handing over possession - it is contended by the CD that the FC for the termination of the agreement has relied upon a wrong clause, as invocation of clause 6.4 of the Agreement is completely misplaced on the part of the FC - HELD THAT:- It is clearly evident that even after the offer of possession made in the year 2017 by the CD effective possession of the property contracted to each of the parties have not been given by the CD which is also admitted by CD, however, wants to consider exclusion of time of delay as beyond its control, which plea cannot be entertained. It is required to be kept in mind by this Tribunal the recent pronouncement made by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Pioneer Land & Infrastructure Ltd. & another Vs. Union of India and others [2019 (8) TMI 532 - SUPREME COURT], wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court after considering several objections raised by the Real Estate Developers as to whether a Home Buyer can be considered as an FC, has categorically come to the conclusion that Home Buyers can be considered as FCs, both prior to as well as subsequent to the amendment of Sec. 5(8) (f) of IBC 2016 by Amendment Act of 2018 incorporating the explanation to the said provisions as the Home Buyers finance the project significantly as developed by the Real Estate Developers. It is clearly evident that even after the offer of possession made in the year 2017 by the CD effective possession of the property contracted to each of the parties have not been given by the CD which is also admitted by CD, however, wants to consider exclusion of time of delay as beyond its control, which plea cannot be entertained - Petition admitted - moratorium declared. Issues:1. Application under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed jointly by three Petitioners.2. Details of the Corporate Debtor (CD) and financial claims by the Petitioners.3. Allegations of default by the CD in handing over possession of properties to the Petitioners.4. Arguments and contentions presented by both parties regarding the termination of agreements and possession of flats.5. Legal interpretation of Home Buyers as Financial Creditors (FCs) and their rights under the IBC 2016.6. Decision on admitting the petition and initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for the CD.Analysis:1. The petition was filed under Section 7 of the IBC by three Petitioners, detailing the incorporation of the Corporate Debtor (CD) and financial claims by the Petitioners. The proposed Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was named in the petition.2. The Petitioners, as Financial Creditors, alleged default by the CD in handing over possession of properties, specifying the amounts due and outstanding compensation claims for delays by each Financial Creditor.3. The Petitioners booked apartments in a project developed by the CD, and after delays in possession, sought termination of agreements and refund of principal amounts with interest, leading to the petition before the Tribunal.4. The CD contended that possession was offered in 2017, and any delays were due to circumstances beyond their control, challenging the termination of agreements by the Petitioners.5. The Tribunal referenced a recent Supreme Court judgment, establishing Home Buyers as Financial Creditors under the IBC, emphasizing their right to seek termination of agreements and refunds in case of default by the Real Estate Developers.6. Considering the facts and legal precedents, the Tribunal admitted the petition, initiated the CIRP for the CD, appointed the proposed IRP, and imposed a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, directing adherence to relevant rules and regulations during the resolution process.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found