Transit penalty under VAT law turns on statutory conditions and disclosed consignor-consignee details can defeat one penalty provision.

Penalty under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act was upheld where the transit documents and surrounding facts did not support the asserted sale and showed inconsistencies in destination and supporting records, so the challenge depended largely on factual appreciation. Penalty under the provision covering failure to disclose consignor or consignee, or transport without proper or genuine documents, was quashed because the checking documents themselves disclosed both consignor and consignee, leaving the statutory precondition unsatisfied. The appeal therefore succeeded only to the limited extent of setting aside that penalty, while the other penalty was sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether penalty under Section 51(7)(b) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was justified on the facts of the transit transaction. (ii) Whether Section 51(12) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 could be invoked when the documents produced at the time of checking disclosed the consignor and consignee.

Issue (i): Whether penalty under Section 51(7)(b) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 was justified on the facts of the transit transaction.

Analysis: The goods were accompanied by documents showing the consignor, consignee and movement of the goods, but the invoice and declaration did not support the asserted sale to the Punjab dealer at the time of checking. The purchase order was not with the goods, the destination mentioned in the documents did not tally consistently, and no invoice from the appellant in favour of the alleged purchaser was produced before the authorities. The transaction was therefore treated as one without proper documentation, and the challenge raised was found to turn on factual appreciation rather than any legal infirmity in the penalty proceedings.

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 51(7)(b) was upheld and the assessee did not succeed on this issue.

Issue (ii): Whether Section 51(12) of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 could be invoked when the documents produced at the time of checking disclosed the consignor and consignee.

Analysis: Section 51(12) applies where the transporter fails to give information about the consignor or consignee or transports goods without documents or with ingenuine documents. Since the documents produced at the time of checking contained the required particulars of consignor and consignee, the precondition for invoking this provision was absent.

Conclusion: Penalty under Section 51(12) was quashed and the assessee succeeded on this issue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of setting aside the penalty under Section 51(12), while the penalty under Section 51(7)(b) was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A penalty provision can be invoked only when its statutory conditions are satisfied, and a transit penalty based on absence of documents or false particulars cannot be sustained where the checking documents themselves disclose the consignor and consignee.

---