Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2013 (1) TMI 1008 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Ruling: Advertisement Revenues Not Taxable for SAS BV & NBC Asia CV Limited The Tribunal held that advertisement revenues earned by SAS BV should not be taxed in the assessee's hands. The Tribunal also decided that the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Ruling: Advertisement Revenues Not Taxable for SAS BV & NBC Asia CV Limited

                          The Tribunal held that advertisement revenues earned by SAS BV should not be taxed in the assessee's hands. The Tribunal also decided that the advertisement revenues should be taxed on a receipt basis. Additionally, revenues from NBC Asia CV Limited were held not taxable as fees for technical services. The Tribunal confirmed the deletion of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) was deleted as the assessee had a genuine belief regarding tax liability. Appeals for the assessee were allowed for certain assessment years, while appeals by the AO were dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Taxability of advertisement revenues earned by Satellite Television Asian Region Advertising Sales BV (SAS BV) in the hands of the assessee.
                          2. Basis of taxation (accrual vs. receipt) of advertisement income.
                          3. Taxability of revenues from NBC Asia CV Limited as fees for technical services.
                          4. Levy of interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C.
                          5. Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c).

                          Summary:

                          1. Taxability of Advertisement Revenues (AY 1998-1999 & 1999-2000):
                          The Tribunal held that SAS BV cannot be considered a conduit for the assessee. The advertisement revenues earned by SAS BV should not be taxed in the hands of the assessee. The Tribunal relied on its previous decisions and found no income accrued or arisen to the assessee-company under the head advertisement revenue during the assessment years under consideration. Hence, the order of the CIT(A) was reversed.

                          2. Basis of Taxation (AY 1998-1999, 1999-2000 & 2000-2001):
                          The Tribunal decided that the advertisement revenues should be taxed on a receipt basis rather than on an accrual basis. This decision was based on previous Tribunal orders and the CBDT Circular No.742, which recognized the peculiarity and specialty of such transactions. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's method of accounting on a receipt basis.

                          3. Taxability of Revenues from NBC Asia CV Limited (AY 1999-2000):
                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the revenues earned from NBC Asia CV Limited for services rendered outside India are not taxable in India as fees for technical services u/s 9(1)(vii) of the Act. This decision was based on the Hon'ble Delhi High Court's judgment in the case of Asia Satellite Telecommunications Company Ltd.

                          4. Levy of Interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C (AY 1998-1999, 1999-2000 & 2000-2001):
                          The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order deleting the interest charged u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C. It was held that the assessee could not be penalized for the fault of another party (i.e., non-deduction of tax at source by the payer). The Tribunal also referred to the case of NGC Network Asia LLC, where it was held that interest u/s 234A, 234B, and 234C is not applicable to non-residents.

                          5. Deletion of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) (AY 1998-1999 & 1999-2000):
                          The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty imposed by the AO u/s 271(1)(c). It was found that the assessee had a bona fide belief that the income was to be taxed in the hands of SAS BV, and there was no intention to avoid tax. The issue was debatable, and hence, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not warranted.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeals filed by the assessee for AY 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 were allowed, and the appeals filed by the AO for AY 1998-1999, 1999-2000, and 2000-2001, including the penalty appeals, were dismissed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found