TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was admissible on excisable goods exported under the Advance Authorisation Scheme when the governing central excise notifications required export without payment of duty.
Analysis: The order examined the scheme of Notification No. 44/2001-C.E. (N.T.) and Notification No. 42/2001-Central Excise (N.T.), both issued under Rule 19 of the Central Excise (No. 2) Rules, 2001, and held that they govern removal and export of excisable goods without payment of duty. Notification No. 96/2009-Cus. was found to deal with duty relief on imported materials under Advance Authorisation and not with payment of duty on final excisable goods manufactured for export. Since the relevant excise notifications barred clearance of export goods on payment of duty, the amount paid from the CENVAT account did not create a rebate entitlement under Rule 18. The cited precedent was distinguished on facts.
Conclusion: Rebate under Rule 18 was not admissible, and the order rejecting the revision applications was upheld in favour of Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the applicable export notifications under the excise scheme require export without payment of duty, payment of duty on the exported goods does not confer a right to rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
