TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals allowed on interest disallowance under section 40A(2)(b) for assessment years 2001-2004</h1> <h3>M/s. Laxmi Pulse Rice & Roller Flour Mills Versus The A.C.I.T., Cent. Cir-1, Baroda</h3> The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench allowed all three appeals of the assessee related to the disallowance of interest payments u/s 40A (2) (b) for the assessment ... - Issues Involved:The judgment deals with the disallowance of interest payments u/s 40A (2) (b) of the Income Tax Act in the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04. The primary issue is whether the interest paid by the assessee at 18% to depositors is excessive and unreasonable compared to the market rate, leading to disallowance by the Assessing Officer and subsequent confirmation by the CIT(A).Assessment Year 2001-02:The assessee, engaged in pulse, rice & roller flour milling business, faced disallowance of interest payments by the Assessing Officer under u/s 40A (2) (a) of the Act, as the interest rate was considered higher than the prevailing market rate. The CIT(A) restricted the disallowance to a certain amount after considering various factors and market rates. The ITAT Ahmedabad Bench, in a similar case, had previously ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the interest rate of 18% was not excessive given the circumstances. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for AY 2001-02 based on consistency with the previous decision.Assessment Years 2002-03 and 2003-04:Since the facts and issues for these assessment years were similar to that of 2001-02, the Tribunal decided to follow the decision taken for AY 2001-02. Both appeals for AY 2002-03 and 2003-04 were allowed in favor of the assessee based on the previous ruling and consistency in decision-making.Conclusion:In conclusion, the ITAT Ahmedabad Bench allowed all three appeals of the assessee related to the disallowance of interest payments u/s 40A (2) (b) for the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, and 2003-04. The Tribunal considered market rates, previous decisions, and the specific circumstances of the case to rule in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowances made by the revenue authorities.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
