Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dedication was in favour of two deities, Sree Sree Radha Jew and Sree Sree Gobind Jew, and consequently whether income from the property was to be included separately in their total income under section 9(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The dedication documents were executed by an illiterate and unsophisticated religious lady in vernacular language and had to be construed in their setting, bearing in mind surrounding circumstances and the ordinary Hindu religious concept. The evidence on record, including the existence of two distinct images, separate worship and the priest's statement, supported the finding that Radha Jew and Gobind Jew were two different deities with separate existence. The Tribunal's view that the property was held for two deities and that the income attributable to property had to be dealt with separately was, therefore, justified.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee. The dedication was held to be in favour of two deities, and the income from property was liable to be included separately in their respective assessments.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the intention of an early religious dedication is gathered from the documents read with surrounding circumstances and the evidence shows two distinct deities with separate worship and existence, the income relating to the dedicated property must be assessed separately in accordance with the beneficial interests so found.