Completed giving and taking sustains a valid Hindu adoption; datta homam is not essential within the same gotra.

A Hindu adoption was treated as valid where the evidence showed completed giving and taking of the child: the natural father gave the child in adoption, the adoptive mother received him, and the customary act was performed. The absence of datta homam did not invalidate the adoption because the child and adoptive father belonged to the same gotra, making that ceremony unnecessary in law, though religiously proper. Allegations of fraud, coercion, undue influence, and improper use of evidence were found unsupported and insufficiently particularised, so the challenge to the adoption failed and the adoption was upheld as genuine and voluntary.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the adoption was in fact completed by the requisite giving and taking of the child, (ii) whether the absence of datta homam invalidated the adoption, and (iii) whether the adoption was vitiated by fraud, coercion, undue influence, or improper use of evidence.

Issue (i): Whether the adoption was in fact completed by the requisite giving and taking of the child.

Analysis: The evidence was treated as clear and consistent that the child was selected, the natural father gave him in adoption, the adoptive mother received him, and the child was taken on her lap in completion of the customary act. The documentary record and oral testimony were found to support the same conclusion, and the contrary evidence was rejected as either irrelevant or untrustworthy.

Conclusion: The adoption was completed in fact and in law.

Issue (ii): Whether the absence of datta homam invalidated the adoption.

Analysis: The rule was held not to make datta homam an essential legal requirement where the adopted child belonged to the same gotra as the adoptive father. The authorities were treated as establishing that the ceremony is unnecessary in such a case, even if proper as a religious observance.

Conclusion: The absence of datta homam did not invalidate the adoption.

Issue (iii): Whether the adoption was vitiated by fraud, coercion, undue influence, or improper use of evidence.

Analysis: The allegations were found to be unsupported and insufficiently particularised. No fraud, cajolery, coercion, or unfair advantage was established. The use of criminal depositions and other documents in the civil case was criticised as irregular, but that did not alter the finding that the adoption itself was genuine and voluntary.

Conclusion: The attack on the adoption on these grounds failed.

Final Conclusion: The adoption was upheld as valid, and the challenge to it was rejected in all material respects.

Ratio Decidendi: In an adoption within the same gotra, datta homam is not an essential legal ceremony, and a completed giving and taking of the child according to the requisite Hindu custom constitutes a valid adoption absent proven vitiating factors.

---