Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2019 (12) TMI 1370 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Approves Composite Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger & Amalgamation The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement filed by two companies, involving demerger and amalgamation steps, under Sections 230 to 232 ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal Approves Composite Scheme of Arrangement for Demerger & Amalgamation

                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement filed by two companies, involving demerger and amalgamation steps, under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The scheme included provisions for employee protection, compliance with statutory requirements, accounting standards, and tax liabilities. The Tribunal approved the scheme subject to conditions such as property transfer, continuation of legal proceedings, employee transfers, and necessary filings. The order emphasized no exemption from stamp duty or taxes and allowed the petitions on specified terms.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Approval of the Composite Scheme of Arrangement.
                            2. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal.
                            3. Compliance with statutory requirements.
                            4. Protection of employees' interests.
                            5. Tax liabilities and pending disputes.
                            6. Compliance with Accounting Standards.
                            7. Investigation proceedings status.
                            8. Final sanction and conditions of the scheme.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Approval of the Composite Scheme of Arrangement:
                            The Joint Company Petitions were filed by M/s. India Land and Properties Limited (Demerged Company) and M/s. Indiabulls Infrastructure Limited (Resulting Company) for the approval of the Composite Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme involves two steps: (a) Demerger of the Demerged Undertaking into the Resulting Company, and (b) Amalgamation of the Residual Transferor Company with the Transferee Company.

                            2. Jurisdiction of the Tribunal:
                            The Transferee Company is a public listed company with its registered office in New Delhi, falling outside the jurisdiction of the NCLT, Chennai, and within the jurisdiction of NCLT, New Delhi. However, the petitions were filed before the Chennai Bench for sanctioning the Scheme.

                            3. Compliance with statutory requirements:
                            The Tribunal issued directions for notices to Statutory/Regulatory Authorities and for paper publication. Notices were served to various authorities including the Regional Director, RoC, SEBI, Stock Exchanges, and the Income Tax Department. The Petitioner Companies filed an affidavit confirming compliance with these directions.

                            4. Protection of employees' interests:
                            The Regional Director's report highlighted that the Scheme includes provisions for protecting the interests of employees/staff of the demerged undertaking and the Transferor Company. Clause 5 of Part B and Clause 12 of Part C of the Scheme specifically address these protections.

                            5. Tax liabilities and pending disputes:
                            The Official Liquidator's report noted that the Transferor Company had received a demand notice under Section 156 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment year 2016-2017, amounting to Rs. 1,56,14,590/-. The Tribunal observed that all tax assessment proceedings/appeals against the Residual Transferor Company shall be continued and enforced by the Transferee Company. The Tribunal referenced the NCLAT decision in Ad2Pro Creative Solutions Private Limited, which held that tax liabilities would be satisfied by the Transferee as determined by the competent forum.

                            6. Compliance with Accounting Standards:
                            The Independent Statutory Auditors of the Transferor and Transferee Companies certified that the proposed Scheme is in conformity with the accounting standards specified under Section 133 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Petitioner Companies complied with the relevant provisions of Sections 230(7) and 232(3) of the Act.

                            7. Investigation proceedings status:
                            The Petitioner Companies confirmed that no investigation proceedings were pending against them under the Companies Act, 1956 or the Companies Act, 2013, and no proceedings were pending under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 2013.

                            8. Final sanction and conditions of the scheme:
                            The Tribunal sanctioned the Composite Scheme of Arrangement, subject to several conditions, including:
                            - Transfer of all properties, rights, powers, liabilities, and duties of the Demerged Undertaking to the Resulting Company.
                            - Continuation of all proceedings by or against the Demerged Undertaking against the Demerged Company or the Resulting Company.
                            - Transfer of all employees of the Demerged Company to the Resulting Company without interruption of service.
                            - Filing of necessary applications for the conversion of the Resulting Company to a private limited company.
                            - No issuance of shares by the Transferee Company in exchange for shares held by the Resulting Company in the Residual Transferor Company.
                            - Filing of revised Memorandum and Articles of Association with the RoC, Chennai, and payment of differential fees for the enhancement of authorized capital.
                            - Delivery of a certified copy of the order to the RoC for registration, leading to the dissolution of the Residual Transferor Company.

                            The Tribunal clarified that the order does not grant exemption from payment of stamp duty, taxes, or any other charges, and any deficiencies or violations found will not prevent action against the concerned persons in accordance with the law. The Company Petitions were allowed on the aforementioned terms.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found