TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeal for rectifying Cenvat credit errors, remands for verification.</h1> <h3>CONTINENTAL ENGINES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CGST, ALWAR</h3> CONTINENTAL ENGINES PVT. LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CGST, ALWAR - 2020 (35) G. S. T. L. 402 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:Whether discrepancy in availing Cenvat credit due to accounting error is hit by the third proviso to Rule 4(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.Analysis:Issue 1: Discrepancy in Availing Cenvat CreditThe appellant, a manufacturer of engine parts, availed Cenvat credit for 35 invoices but later found discrepancies due to accounting errors. The appellant admitted to short availing credit on 34 invoices, rectifying the error by taking the differential amount as credit later. The Revenue issued a show cause notice claiming the rectified credit was ineligible under the third proviso to Rule 4(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.Issue 2: Interpretation of Rule 4(1) of Cenvat Credit RulesRule 4(1) allows immediate availing of Cenvat credit upon receipt of inputs, with a proviso that credit cannot be taken after one year from the date of issue of specified documents. The appellant argued that rectification entries do not constitute the first-time availing of credit under Rule 4(1), seeking allowance of the appeal based on previous rulings supporting their position.Issue 3: Adjudication and DecisionThe Tribunal examined the facts and found that the appellant had initially availed the credit within the permissible time but later rectified the short availed credits due to clerical errors. The Tribunal held that the third proviso to Rule 4(1) would not apply in cases of rectification entries for short availed credits. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for verification. The appellant was directed to provide supporting evidence within 60 days for the Adjudicating Authority's review.In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision favored the appellant, allowing the rectification of short availed Cenvat credit due to accounting errors and directing further verification by the Adjudicating Authority.
TaxTMI 