Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tribunal rules loan from common shareholders to company not deemed dividend</h1> <h3>M/s Enmas Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Circle II (1), Chennai</h3> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the limited company appellant, holding that the loan amount received from a group concern with common shareholders did not ... - Issues involved: Interpretation of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding deemed dividend in the case of a limited company receiving loans from a group concern with common shareholders.Summary:Issue 1: Deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e)The appellant, a limited company engaged in engineering consultancy, declared a loss in the assessment year and received loans from a group concern. The Assessing Officer treated the loan amount as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) due to common shareholders in both companies. The CIT(Appeals) upheld this decision citing a precedent. However, the appellant argued that the decision referred to a partnership firm, not a limited company, and loans must be taken by a shareholder to attract Section 2(22)(e).Issue 2: Interpretation of deemed dividendThe Tribunal noted that the appellant was not a shareholder in the concern from which it received loans, despite common shareholders. Referring to previous court decisions, the Tribunal emphasized that deemed dividend can only be taxed in the case of a shareholder. The Tribunal distinguished the present case from a partnership firm scenario and concluded that the appellant, not being a shareholder, should not be subject to the provisions of Section 2(22)(e).Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the addition made under Section 2(22)(e) in the hands of the appellant was not justified and therefore deleted. The decision was pronounced on November 7, 2012, in Chennai.