Court sets aside ex parte decree in favor of defendant firm due to improper summons service.

The court set aside a decree obtained ex parte in favor of the plaintiff, ruling in favor of the defendant firm. The judge found that the defendants were not prevented by sufficient cause from appearing at the hearing but scrutinized the service of summons under Order V, Rule 17. It was concluded that the summons was not duly served as the serving peon did not make adequate efforts to locate the defendants before resorting to substituted service. The ex parte decree and attachment proceedings were set aside, with the defendants required to pay costs for the application.

---

---

Issues:
1. Setting aside a decree obtained ex parte.
2. Validity of service of summons under Order V, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Analysis:
1. The judgment involves an application by members of a defendant firm to set aside a decree obtained ex parte in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants sought relief under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, asserting that they were either not duly served the summons or were prevented by sufficient cause from appearing at the hearing. The judge noted that the rule's branches are disjunctive, allowing the plaintiff to benefit if either condition is satisfied. The judge found that the defendants, through their authorized agent, were aware of the legal proceedings and failed to take timely steps to defend the suit, thus not being prevented by sufficient cause from appearing. However, the judge examined the service of summons to determine if it was duly served.

2. The judgment extensively analyzed the service of summons under Order V, Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff claimed substituted service was duly effected, while the defendants contested the validity of the service. The judge referred to precedents emphasizing the necessity of making all reasonable efforts to effect personal service before resorting to substituted service. The judge highlighted the importance of diligent attempts to locate the defendant before affixing the summons. In this case, the judge found that the serving peon did not make adequate efforts to locate the defendants before resorting to substituted service. Consequently, the judge concluded that the summons was not duly served, leading to the setting aside of the ex parte decree and attachment proceedings. The judge imposed conditions for restoring the case to the list, including the payment of all costs related to the application by the defendants.

3. Additionally, the judgment noted an undertaking by the plaintiff's solicitor to serve the defendant's solicitor with a copy of the summons, indicating procedural steps to be taken in the case.

---