Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the sum received from the Colonial Bishopric Fund constituted income of the assessee. (ii) Whether the income accrued or arose in British India. (iii) Whether the allowance was taxable as salary under the head "salaries" or as income from other sources.
Issue (i): Whether the sum received from the Colonial Bishopric Fund constituted income of the assessee.
Analysis: The character of the receipt was treated as an allowance, and it was accepted on behalf of the assessee that the amount constituted income within the charging provision.
Conclusion: The sum was income of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the income accrued or arose in British India.
Analysis: The receipt was not received in British India, but it became payable only because the assessee held the office of Lord Bishop of Lucknow in India. The right to receive the amount was dependent on continued holding of that position in India, and the payment would cease if he abandoned the appointment and returned to England. On that footing, the income sprang into existence and became payable in British India.
Conclusion: The income accrued or arose in British India.
Issue (iii): Whether the allowance was taxable as salary under the head "salaries" or as income from other sources.
Analysis: The allowance was received by reason of the assessee's office and not in a personal capacity. The definition of salary included fees and perquisites received in addition to salary or on account of the office held, and the allowance was treated as a perquisite attached to the position.
Conclusion: The amount was taxable as salary under the head "salaries".
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee on the material questions, and the receipt was held taxable as income arising in British India and chargeable under the head "salaries".
Ratio Decidendi: A receipt payable only by reason of an office held in India accrues or arises in India where the right to receive it depends on continued holding of that office, and such a payment may constitute salary when it is a perquisite attached to the office.