Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount payable under the agreement created a charge on the income of the villages, and if so, whether that charge could be enforced against transferees who had purchased the villages for valuable consideration without notice.
Analysis: The agreement expressly provided for annual payment out of the income of the villages, which showed an intention to create a charge on the income. However, a charge does not amount to a transfer of an interest in the property. On the law as it then stood, and consistently with the principle embodied in Section 100 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a charge created by agreement is not enforceable against a transferee for valuable consideration without notice. Since the transferees had purchased without notice, the plaintiff could not proceed against them for recovery out of the village income.
Conclusion: The charge existed, but it was not enforceable against the transferees without notice; the plaintiff's claim against them failed.
Final Conclusion: The decree in favour of the plaintiff was maintained only against the original obligor, and the appeal against the transferees was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A charge on property or its income, whether created by contract or otherwise, is not enforceable against a transferee for value without notice because a charge does not transfer an interest in the property.