Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the monetary limit prescribed for departmental appeals.
Analysis: The appeal was filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the monetary threshold fixed by the CBDT for filing appeals before the Tribunal. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing, but the maintainability of the appeal was governed by the applicable CBDT instruction on low tax effect, and the Revenue accepted that the tax effect was below the prescribed limit.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be not maintainable and was dismissed as unadmitted.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge did not survive on account of the monetary limit applicable to departmental appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed for filing departmental appeals, the appeal is not maintainable and is liable to be dismissed.