TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Proprietary firm barred from initiating Corporate Insolvency Process under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.</h1> <h3>Popular Plastics & Packaging Industries Versus S.D. Heavy Sea Food Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The Tribunal held that a proprietary firm cannot commence Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The ... Permission for withdrawal of application - initiation of CIRP - judicial identity of entity to initiate CIRP - It is seen that notice under section 8 of IBC is initiated by the Proprietary firm and even under section 9 it is initiated by proprietary firm, which is not judicial person and it cannot initiate CIRP, in view of section 3(23) of IBC. In view of this, Ld. Counsel for the operational creditor seeks permission to withdraw the application with a liberty to file afresh. HELD THAT:- Matter stands withdrawn and disposed off. The Tribunal found that a proprietary firm, not being a judicial person, cannot initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under section 8 or 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The operational creditor was allowed to withdraw the application with the liberty to file afresh, subject to the law of limitation. The matter was withdrawn and disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
