Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether ceramic magnets imported in unmagnetized condition were classifiable as component parts of loudspeakers under Item 73(11) of the Indian Customs Tariff or under the residuary Item 87, and whether the post-importation processes of cleaning, demagnetisation and magnetisation altered their classification.
Analysis: The imported goods were of a special shape, size and quality suitable for use as loudspeaker components. The post-importation operations relied upon by the importer did not show any change in the essential character of the goods, and the processes described were not established as manufacturing processes. The cost of such processes was also found to be insignificant when compared with the landed cost. The Tribunal therefore treated the magnets as already having the attributes of component parts and held that magnetisation and allied steps did not take them out of Item 73(11) or justify resort to the residuary entry.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Item 73(11) of the Indian Customs Tariff and not under Item 87; the assessee's claim for reassessment and refund failed.