Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a company in liquidation remains a company for purposes of income-tax liability and whether the official liquidator is bound to furnish the income-tax return.
Analysis: The expression "company" in the Income-tax Act was held to include a company in liquidation because a company continues to exist until dissolution under the Companies Act. The official liquidators, while managing the business during winding-up, could be treated as the "principal officer" or as managers within the statutory meaning, and the inability to apply some deduction provisions in every liquidation case did not affect the basic liability to make a return. The scheme of the Act showed an intention to cast the tax net widely, and there was no basis for treating companies in liquidation as exempt merely because liquidation had commenced. The possibility of enforcing tax against company property was also not excluded by the Companies Act.
Conclusion: The official liquidator is not exempt from making the income-tax return, and the income-tax authorities may require the return to be furnished.