Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum received as compensation for loss of managing agency was a receipt arising from business and, if so, whether it was exempt under Section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The payment was made to the assessee company because one of its managing agencies was brought to an end and was described as compensation for loss of office. The statutory question was not whether the amount was a perquisite of an office, but whether it was a receipt arising from business within the meaning of the exemption clause. The Court held that the assessee carried on several managing agencies and that the payment was made in the course of that business relationship. The receipt therefore answered the statutory description of a business receipt and could not be excluded merely because it was linked to the termination of one managing agency. The English cases relied on were treated as inapposite because they turned on the concept of perquisites of office rather than the language of the Indian exemption provision. The Court also observed that, apart from the exemption clause, the amount would fall within the charging provisions as income.
Conclusion: The exemption under Section 4(3)(vii) did not apply, and the receipt was taxable.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee and the assessment of income-tax on the amount was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made as compensation for termination of a managing agency may still be a receipt arising from business, and it is not exempt under Section 4(3)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 merely because it is connected with loss of office.