Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 72A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 bars amalgamation of companies merely because the amalgamation may result in carry forward and set-off of losses and possible tax consequence to the Revenue, and whether the earlier order sanctioning amalgamation should be recalled.
Analysis: Section 72A creates a legal fiction governing the treatment of accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation after amalgamation. It regulates the availability of carry forward and set-off benefits in the hands of the amalgamated company and specifies the conditions for denial of such benefit, but it does not prohibit amalgamation itself. The provision operates in the post-amalgamation field and the potential loss of revenue is not, by itself, a legal bar to sanctioning amalgamation. In addition, the request to reopen the amalgamation order came after a substantial lapse of time, and unsettling the sanction already granted would cause prejudice to the amalgamated company.
Conclusion: Section 72A does not forbid amalgamation on the ground of losses, and the recall of the amalgamation order was rightly refused.