Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (1) TMI 1608 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT Upholds 8% Net Profit Rate for Assessee; Books Rejection Justified Due to Defects; No Further Additions Made. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the rejection of the books of account justified due to noted defects. It upheld an 8% net profit rate of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT Upholds 8% Net Profit Rate for Assessee; Books Rejection Justified Due to Defects; No Further Additions Made.

                          The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the rejection of the books of account justified due to noted defects. It upheld an 8% net profit rate of gross receipts, subject to depreciation and interest deductions, as reasonable and supported by past judicial decisions. No further trading addition was warranted since the net profit rate after deductions was 8.09%. The order was pronounced in open court on 24/01/2018.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Rejection of books of account and application of Section 145(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Estimation of net profit rate for contract business.
                          3. Estimation of net profit rate for grit business.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Rejection of Books of Account and Application of Section 145(3)
                          The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the books of account for several reasons:
                          - No separate accounts for contract business and grit business.
                          - Lack of detailed day-to-day expenses and material consumption records.
                          - Major expenses were debited under a single head without proper vouchers.

                          The assessee argued that maintaining separate accounts was impractical due to the common nature of the business setup and expenses. The assessee also contended that most expenses were supported by bills, and the lack of stock registers should not lead to rejection of books. The assessee cited several judicial precedents supporting their position.

                          The ITAT held that the rejection of books of account was justified due to the various defects noted by the AO and CIT(A). However, it was also noted that in previous years, the same books of account were accepted without issue.

                          2. Estimation of Net Profit Rate for Contract Business
                          The AO estimated the net profit rate at 8% of the total contract receipts, resulting in an addition of Rs. 77,16,268. The CIT(A) revised this to 5.1%, sustaining an addition of Rs. 49,19,121.

                          The assessee argued that the estimation was unfair and not supported by past history or comparative cases. The assessee highlighted that in the assessment year (AY) 2011-12, the ITAT found the declared profit to be more than 8% of gross receipts, subject to depreciation and interest deductions. The assessee also pointed out an increase in depreciation due to new machinery purchases, which affected the net profit rate.

                          The ITAT noted that the gross profit rate for the year under consideration was better than the previous two years. Citing the Rajasthan High Court and ITAT precedents, the ITAT held that a net profit rate of 8% of gross receipts, subject to depreciation and interest deductions, was reasonable. In this case, the net profit rate, after such deductions, was 8.09%, which was deemed acceptable.

                          3. Estimation of Net Profit Rate for Grit Business
                          The AO estimated the net profit rate at 5.5% for the grit business, resulting in an addition of Rs. 41,70,387. The CIT(A) revised this to 5.1%, sustaining an addition of Rs. 38,67,086.

                          The assessee argued that the books of account were properly maintained and audited, with no material discrepancies pointed out by the AO. The assessee also maintained that common books of accounts for both businesses were practical and had been accepted in previous years.

                          The ITAT reiterated that the net profit rate of 8% of gross receipts, subject to depreciation and interest deductions, was reasonable. Given that the net profit rate after such deductions was 8.09%, no further trading addition was warranted.

                          Conclusion:
                          The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, concluding that:
                          - The rejection of books of account was justified due to noted defects.
                          - The net profit rate of 8% of gross receipts, subject to depreciation and interest deductions, was reasonable and supported by past judicial decisions.
                          - No further trading addition was warranted as the net profit rate after deductions was already 8.09%.

                          Order:
                          The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in the open court on 24/01/2018.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found