Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the profits from the first six items of loans were attributable to the non-resident bank through or from a business connection in British India within the meaning of Section 42(1) of the Indian Income Tax Act, so as to justify assessment through the resident bank as agent.
Analysis: The decisive factors were that the two banks were under the effective control of the same family in British India, the resident bank was substantially financed by the non-resident bank, the lending arrangement was continuous and not isolated, and the Bentong office functioned only as a nominal conduit. The Court held that a business connection need not arise from contracts made in British India and may be inferred from a continuing course of dealings and from the practical control securing the flow of business between the two concerns. On the facts, the financing arrangement was not a mere isolated loan transaction but a business connection located in British India.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative, and the income was held to accrue or arise to the non-resident bank through a business connection in British India, making the assessment valid.