Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer's discretion under Section 45 of the Income-tax Act to treat the assessee as not in default pending appeal was capable, in the circumstances of the case, of becoming a duty to forbear enforcement of the notice of demand until the appeal was disposed of.
Analysis: The assessee had preferred an appeal against the assessment and the refusal to renew registration, raising substantial questions both of fact and law. The assessments of the connected firms were also made protectively, which safeguarded the revenue and showed that immediate coercive recovery was not necessary. In those circumstances, the power under Section 45, though expressed in discretionary form, could not be exercised arbitrarily or capriciously. Where the circumstances justified it, the discretion was coupled with a duty to grant extension of time and to refrain from enforcing the demand until the appeal was decided.
Conclusion: The respondent was bound to forbear from taking steps to enforce the notice of demand until disposal of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded only to the extent of securing interim protection against recovery under the demand notice pending the appeal, and the assessee obtained costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory discretion relating to recovery of tax may, in a proper case, be controlled by the circumstances so that it becomes a duty to suspend enforcement pending a substantive appeal, especially where immediate recovery is unnecessary to protect the revenue.