Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts of the case, the assessee or the job-worker was the real manufacturer liable to pay central excise duty on the cleared goods.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured from raw materials supplied by the assessee, processed by the job-worker on the assessee's instructions, and cleared from the assessee's premises after job work. The agreement and records relied upon by the assessee were found unreliable, and there was no material to show that the job-worker was the independent manufacturer. In these circumstances, the job-worker could not be treated as the real manufacturer, and the duty burden remained on the assessee.
Conclusion: The issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue; the assessee was held liable for the duty demand and allied consequences.