Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether an unregistered association of firms carrying on business could be assessed to income tax notwithstanding non-compliance with the Companies Act; (ii) whether depreciation allowance was admissible in respect of machinery, plant and buildings owned or leased by constituent firms.
Issue (i): whether an unregistered association of firms carrying on business could be assessed to income tax notwithstanding non-compliance with the Companies Act.
Analysis: Under Section 3 of the Income Tax Act, 1922, tax is leviable on the income, profits and gains of a company, firm and other association of individuals. The definition of company in Section 2(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 did not bring the assessee within that class, but the assessee answered to the description of a firm or association of individuals. Non-registration under Section 4 of the Companies Act, 1913 might entail penalties or disabilities under company law, but it did not prevent the entity from being treated as taxable under the income-tax law.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative. The assessee was liable to assessment to income tax on its profits.
Issue (ii): whether depreciation allowance was admissible in respect of machinery, plant and buildings owned or leased by constituent firms.
Analysis: Section 10 of the Income Tax Act, 1922 allows depreciation only in respect of buildings, machinery, plant or furniture used for the purposes of the business in respect of which the assessment is made. The assets in question belonged to, or were used by, the constituent firms, which were separately assessed, and were not shown to be used in the business of the assessee in respect of the assessed profits.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. No depreciation allowance was admissible to the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The reference was disposed of by holding the assessee taxable on its profits and by rejecting its claim for depreciation allowance, with costs awarded against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An entity may be assessed to income tax according to its taxable character under the income-tax statute even if it is not validly constituted under company law, and depreciation is allowable only for assets used in the business in respect of which the assessment is made.