Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion to another religion by a person or his family automatically causes loss of Scheduled Tribe status, and whether the quashing of proceedings under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act was justified without trial.
Analysis: The constitutional scheme under Article 342 makes Scheduled Tribe status dependent on the Presidential notification and the social and customary attributes of the community. A person does not necessarily cease to be a member of a tribe merely because of conversion; the decisive inquiry is whether the person continues to be accepted as part of the tribe and whether tribal customs, traits, and customary laws of marriage, succession, inheritance, and social life continue to be observed. That inquiry is fact-specific and cannot be answered in the abstract. The Court also held that executive circulars cannot determine legal status under Article 13. On the facts, whether the victim's family had ceased to be members of the notified tribe could be decided only at trial, and the High Court erred in quashing the charge at the threshold.
Conclusion: Conversion by itself does not automatically terminate Scheduled Tribe status; the issue depends on evidence of continued tribal identity and customs, and the proceedings could not have been quashed without trial.