Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Snack Tax Rates Revised: Lays, Kurkure, Cheetos at 2%, Quaker Oats at 5%. Refund with Interest Ordered.</h1> <h3>M/s. Aalayam Traders Versus The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT), Puducherry</h3> The HC ruled that Lays, Kurkure, and Cheetos are taxable as 'savories' at a concessional rate of 2% under the Notification dated 31.07.2013, while Quaker ... Classification of goods - Lays, Kurkure, Cheetos, Quaker Oats - whether taxable in the residual entry under the provisions of Pondicherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007? - Notification issued on 31.07.2013 viz., G.O.Ms.No.25/F2/2013 by the Government of Puducherry - HELD THAT:- It is undoubted and as rightly referred and relied upon by the Coordinate Bench of Madras High Court in the case of Pepsico [2009 (11) TMI 851 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] that in order to decide the questions like the one involved in the present case, the rule of interpretation is to adopt the common parlance test and the resort to residual entry cannot be made, unless by no conceivable process of reasoning, the commodities in question can be brought under any of the tariff items specified in the relevant Notification. As far as the settled legal position about invoking the residual entry and common parlance test is concerned, not much of the serious debate is now left to be decided and the above two yardsticks for interpreting the relevant Notification are now well settled viz., to apply common parlance test and the resort to residual entry only if it is not possible to bring the commodity in question in the specified entry. The Special Entry like the Special Law overrides the General Entry or the General Law. 'Generalia Specialibus Non Derogant', is a settled maxim for interpretation. By the Dictionary meaning and common parlance test, again there is no iota of doubt that all broken grains or cereals including oats, when cooked with water or milk will result in a food item, which can be described as 'Porridge'. It is on the breakfast table for most of us. So, 'Porridge' may be made of different grains and oats amongst them being one which in the present case, has been sold under the brand name of Quaker and the same cannot be ruled out of the definition of 'Porridge', so as to fall in the Entry 99 of III Schedule of the taxable at 5% . Again, the contention of the learned counsel for the Revenue that it is to be taxed in the residual entry is devoid of any merit. The items in question viz., Potato Chips, Salted in the brand name of Lays, Salty Kurkure and Cheetos are taxable as 'Savories' at the rate of 2 % in the Notification dated 31.07.2013 and 'Quaker Oats' are taxable at 5 % as 'Porridge' - Revision allowed. Issues Involved:1. Classification of Lays, Kurkure, Cheetos, and Quaker Oats under the Pondicherry Value Added Tax Act, 2007.2. Applicability of the concessional tax rate under G.O.Ms.No.24/F2/2013 dated 31.07.2013.3. Interpretation of 'savories' and 'processed vegetables' under the PVAT Act.4. Taxability of Quaker Oats as 'Porridge'.5. Validity of the Advance Ruling Authority's decision on the tax rate for Oats.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Classification of Lays, Kurkure, Cheetos, and Quaker Oats:The Assessee contested the classification of these commodities, arguing they should be taxed at a lower rate as 'savories' or 'processed vegetables' rather than under the residual entry attracting a higher tax rate. The Tribunal had earlier held these items taxable under the residual entry at 14.5%.2. Applicability of the Concessional Tax Rate:The Assessee relied on G.O.Ms.No.24/F2/2013, which reduced the tax rate for 'all kinds of cooked food, including sweets, savories and mineral water' from 14.5% to 2%. The Assessee argued that Lays, Kurkure, and Cheetos fall under 'savories' and thus should be taxed at 2%.3. Interpretation of 'Savories' and 'Processed Vegetables':The court emphasized the common parlance test for interpreting tax entries. It noted that 'savories' commonly refer to salty food items, which include Lays, Kurkure, and Cheetos. The court rejected the Revenue's argument that these items should be taxed under the residual entry at 14.5%, stating that the intention of the notification was to extend the benefit of a concessional tax rate to such items.4. Taxability of Quaker Oats as 'Porridge':The Assessee argued that Quaker Oats should be taxed as 'Porridge' at 5% under Entry 99 of the III Schedule of the PVAT Act. The court agreed, citing the dictionary definition of 'Porridge' and common parlance understanding, which includes oats cooked with water or milk.5. Validity of the Advance Ruling Authority's Decision:The court criticized the Advance Ruling Authority's decision, which classified 'Lion Oats' under the residual entry taxable at 14.5%, for lack of reasoning and non-application of mind. The court quashed this ruling, emphasizing the need for detailed reasoning in such decisions.Judgment:The court held that Lays, Kurkure, and Cheetos are taxable as 'savories' at the concessional rate of 2% as per the Notification dated 31.07.2013. It also held that Quaker Oats are taxable at 5% as 'Porridge'. The Tribunal's order was set aside, and the case was remitted to the Assessing Officer to pass fresh orders in line with this judgment. The excess tax collected was ordered to be refunded with interest within one month. The revision petitions filed by the Assessee were allowed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found