Mistake Apparent on the Record: omission to grant relief not rectifiable absent contemporaneous evidence of succession.

The petition contested denial of relief for alleged succession in 1947 and sought rectification under the Travancore Income Tax Act section permitting correction of mistakes apparent on the record. The court found documentary and affidavit evidence insufficient to establish succession in 1947 and noted the assessment record expressly indicated succession from 1-1-1948; therefore the factual basis for 1947 succession was not on the record and the omission to grant relief could not be characterised as a mistake apparent. Outcome: rectification under the statutory provision denied and the petition dismissed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the succession to the petitioner's business occurred in 1947; (ii) Whether the omission to grant relief on the basis of a succession in 1947 constituted a "mistake apparent on the record" permitting rectification under Section 48 of the Travancore Income Tax Act, 1121.

Issue (i): Whether the succession to the petitioner's business took place in 1947.

Analysis: The Court examined the documentary and affidavit evidence, including the petition filed in May 1951 (Ext. I) stating succession as from 1-1-1948, the affidavit of the petitioner asserting discontinuance on 31-12-1947, and the affidavit of the petitioner's son referring to an agreement dated 27-9-1947 and director's meeting of the company on 27-9-1947. The Court found the evidence insufficient to establish definitively that succession occurred in 1947 and noted the record of assessment contained no indication of succession in 1947.

Conclusion: The Court concluded that it could not be established on the record that the succession occurred in 1947; this issue is resolved against the petitioner.

Issue (ii): Whether the omission to grant relief on the basis of a 1947 succession was a mistake apparent from the record of the assessment permitting rectification under Section 48 of the Travancore Income Tax Act, 1121.

Analysis: The Court considered the scope of rectification under Section 48 (mistakes apparent on the record) and the contemporaneous assessment record (Ext. C). The only statement prior to the assessment indicated succession as from 1-1-1948. The Court held that there was no indication in the assessment record of a 1947 succession and that no case based on a 1947 succession was before the assessing officer when the assessment was made. The omission therefore could not be characterised as a mistake apparent on the face of the assessment record.

Conclusion: The Court held that the omission to grant relief on the basis of a 1947 succession was not a mistake apparent from the record; rectification under Section 48 is not available. The conclusion is against the petitioner.

Final Conclusion: The petition seeking declaration, quashing of the rectification order, and mandamus to rectify the assessment is dismissed; the assessorial order denying relief and the refusal to rectify are sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessment record contains no indication of the factual basis for claimed relief (here, succession in 1947) and contemporaneous material points to a different position, an omission to grant relief cannot be treated as a "mistake apparent on the record" warranting statutory rectification under Section 48 of the Travancore Income Tax Act, 1121.

---