Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of Rs. 1,78,485 was liable to be added to the estate of the deceased under the Estate Duty Act as a deemed disposition arising from relinquishment of rights in the HUF assets and firm business.
Analysis: The deceased had relinquished his interest in the HUF business for a consideration which did not represent the entire value of his share. The legal effect of such a transaction, as explained by the Supreme Court precedent applied by the Court, is that the difference between the full value of the share and the amount accepted may amount to a disposition in favour of the remaining members of the HUF. The Tribunal's view that the transaction was only a partial partition and did not attract the statutory provisions was inconsistent with that binding interpretation of sections 2(15), 9(1) and 27(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative, against the accountable person and in favour of the Controller, and the addition was held to be sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a member of a Hindu undivided family parts with his interest in the family assets for less than the full value of his share, the deficiency constitutes a disposition to the remaining members and attracts the estate duty provisions governing deemed transfers.