Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Assessment on Non-Existing Entity Voided for Lack of Jurisdiction</h1> <h3>Siemens Limited (Successor in Interest to Siemens Building Technologies Private Limited) Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax 7 (2), Mumbai</h3> Siemens Limited (Successor in Interest to Siemens Building Technologies Private Limited) Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax 7 (2), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Assessment framed on a non-existing entity due to merger.Analysis:Issue 1: Assessment on non-existing entityThe appeal concerns the assessment order passed by the AO on an entity that ceased to exist due to a merger. The CIT(A) confirmed the assessment, stating that the order was in compliance with the directions of the ITAT and that no infirmity existed in the order. The appellant argued that the assessment on the non-existing entity was void ab initio. The appellant provided evidence of the merger between Siemens Building Technologies Pvt. Ltd and Siemens Limited, demonstrating that the AO proceeded to assess the income of the predecessor company despite the merger. The appellant cited a decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, emphasizing that assessments on non-existing entities are void. Additionally, a co-ordinate Bench decision of the Tribunal in a similar case supported the appellant's argument. The Tribunal found that the AO had passed the assessment order despite being informed of the merger, rendering the assumptions made in the assessment void ab initio. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the assessment for lacking jurisdiction. The appeal was allowed based on this ground, and the issue on merits was not adjudicated.In conclusion, the Tribunal held that the assessment on a non-existing entity due to a merger was void ab initio and quashed the assessment for lacking jurisdiction. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the issue on merits was not addressed.