Statutory presumption for pattadar passbooks supported temporary injunction; concurrent findings were not interfered with in revision.

Pattadar passbooks and title deeds carried the statutory presumption under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land Pattadar Passbooks Act, and any challenge based on 1-B register entries had to be pursued by appeal under Section 5-B. At the interlocutory stage, the courts accepted the respondent's pattadar passbooks, title deeds, adangals and revenue receipts as establishing prima facie entitlement and possession, while the petitioners' reliance on 1-B entries and older revenue records did not displace that material. The concurrent findings were not shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence, so revisional interference was unwarranted and the temporary injunction was upheld.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order granting temporary injunction in favour of the respondent called for interference in revision on the ground that the petitioners relied upon the 1-B register and claimed joint family ownership.

Analysis: The dispute arose at the interlocutory stage, where the Court had to assess possession and prima facie entitlement mainly on documentary material. The respondent relied on pattadar passbooks, title deeds, adangals and revenue receipts, while the petitioners relied on certain 1-B register entries and older revenue records. The pattadar passbooks and title deeds carried the statutory presumption under the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land Pattadar Passbooks Act, and any challenge to their issuance on the basis of 1-B entries had to be pursued by appeal under Section 5-B of the Act. The trial Court and the appellate Court had accepted the respondent's documents and the adangals, and their concurrent findings were not shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. In revisional jurisdiction, such findings did not warrant interference.

Conclusion: The temporary injunction order was upheld and the revision was dismissed.

---