Operational Creditor Petition Admitted Against Corporate Debtor for Non-Payment

The National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, admitted a petition filed by an Operational Creditor under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against a Corporate Debtor for non-payment of goods supplied, establishing debt and default. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed to oversee the insolvency resolution process, and a moratorium under Section 14 of the Code was imposed. The Interim Resolution Professional was directed to conduct a Public Announcement and fulfill duties outlined in Sections 18 and 15 of the Code, ensuring compliance with tribunal directives within specified timelines.

---

---

Issues involved:
1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Existence of debt and default in payment.
3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional.
4. Operation of Moratorium under Section 14 of the Code.
5. Public Announcement of the Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
6. Duties of Interim Resolution Professional under Section 18 and Section 15 of the Code.

Analysis:

1. Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: The Petitioner, an Operational Creditor, filed a petition under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor for a total debt amount. A Demand Notice was served upon the Respondent, informing about the debt amount confirmed by the debtor. The Petitioner provided evidence of the outstanding debt through invoices and stated that the Respondent failed to pay the value of the goods supplied, leading to the initiation of the insolvency resolution process.

2. Existence of Debt and Default in Payment: The Tribunal examined the facts and circumstances of the case and found that the goods were supplied on demand, but the Respondent did not pay the value of the goods as per the invoices. The outstanding debt was acknowledged by the Respondent Debtor, establishing the existence of debt and default in payment. Consequently, the Tribunal admitted the Petition as there was a clear case of debt and default.

3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional: The Operational Creditor proposed the name of an Insolvency Professional, and the proposed Interim Resolution Professional was appointed by the Tribunal after verifying the submitted consent and ensuring no pending disciplinary actions against the professional. The appointed Interim Resolution Professional was tasked with conducting the Insolvency Resolution Process.

4. Operation of Moratorium: Upon admission of the Petition, the Moratorium provisions under Section 14 of the Code became operative, prohibiting the institution of any suit, transferring or encumbering assets of the Debtor. However, the supply of essential goods or services to the Corporate Debtor was allowed during the Moratorium period until the completion of the Insolvency Resolution Process or approval of the Resolution Plan.

5. Public Announcement of the Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process: The Interim Resolution Professional was directed to carry out the Public Announcement of the Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process immediately upon appointment in accordance with the provisions of the Code.

6. Duties of Interim Resolution Professional: The Interim Resolution Professional was mandated to perform duties as assigned under Section 18 and Section 15 of the Code. They were required to inform the progress of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and compliance with the Tribunal's directions within 30 days and were granted liberty to provide updates earlier if necessary.

This detailed analysis covers the key issues addressed in the judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, providing a comprehensive overview of the legal proceedings and decisions made.

---