Back wages require a pre-existing right; reinstatement alone does not automatically create monetary entitlement.

Back wages cannot be claimed under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 unless there is a pre-existing right or an award expressly grants that monetary relief. A reinstatement award by itself does not create an automatic entitlement to back wages, because back wages depend on the facts and circumstances and must be determined in appropriate adjudication proceedings. The Labour Court could not treat back wages as an implied consequence of reinstatement, so the claim under Section 33-C(2) was not maintainable on the basis of the reinstatement award alone.

---

---

Issues: Whether back wages could be claimed under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 when the labour award granted only reinstatement and contained no express direction for back wages.

Analysis: A claim under Section 33-C(2) is maintainable only for enforcement of a pre-existing right or benefit capable of computation in money. An award directing reinstatement, without an express grant of back wages or other consequential monetary relief, does not by itself create an entitlement to back wages. Determination of back wages depends on relevant facts and circumstances and is a matter for adjudication in appropriate proceedings, not for assumption as an implied consequence of reinstatement. The Labour Court therefore could not treat back wages as automatically flowing from the reinstatement order.

Conclusion: The claim for back wages under Section 33-C(2) was not maintainable on the basis of the reinstatement award alone, and the finding in favour of back wages was unsustainable.

---