Tribunal remands duty demand order, accepts manufacturing process argument for MS ingots. Fair review ordered.

The Tribunal set aside the order alleging clandestine removal of goods and duty demand, remanding the matter for a fresh examination. The appellant's contention regarding the recorded runners and risers in the manufacturing process was accepted, leading to a reconsideration of the final output of MS ingots and the consumed intermediate products. The adjudicating authority was directed to review the record thoroughly, allowing the appellant a fair opportunity for reconsideration. The appeal was allowed via remand for a more comprehensive assessment of the case.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against order alleging clandestine removal of goods and duty demand.

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing MS ingots from MS scrap, filed an appeal against the order alleging clandestine removal of goods and duty demand. The Department claimed that during the relevant period, more MS scrap was consumed compared to the production of MS ingots, leading to the accusation of clandestine removal. The appellant contended that the runners and risers created during the manufacturing process were duly recorded in the ER 1, with some being sold and the rest used in the production of MS ingots. The appellant provided details of the runners and risers in the ER 1 and the sales. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's submissions and set aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a fresh examination considering the final output of MS ingots and the consumed runners and risers as an intermediate product from the original scrap. The adjudicating authority was instructed to review the entire record, provide a reasonable opportunity to the appellant, and admit fresh evidence if necessary. Consequently, the appeal was allowed by way of remand, granting the appellant a chance for a fair reconsideration of the case.

---