Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal lay under Section 30 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 against an order appointing a person as agent of a non-resident before any assessment had been made.
Analysis: The appeal provisions in Sections 30 and 31 did not contemplate an appeal at the stage of a mere order under Section 43. The scheme of limitation and appellate powers showed that the Legislature had provided appeals against assessment-related orders, but not against an appointment as agent before any assessment. The deeming provision in Section 42 did not by itself create an immediate right of appeal against the Section 43 order. An assessment might never follow, and the right to challenge the appointment could arise when assessment proceedings were taken and an appeal lay against them.
Conclusion: No appeal lay against the Section 43 order before assessment, and the question was answered in the negative.