Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee had disclosed fully and truly all primary facts necessary for the original assessment so as to bar action under section 147(a) and invalidate the notice under section 148.
Analysis: The return need not contain income from property when the assessee does not admit such income to be taxable in its hands. The assessee's duty is to place all primary facts before the Income-tax Officer and leave the legal inference to be drawn by the officer. Here, the registered partition deed, the claim under section 25A, and the ownership and source of the properties were before the Income-tax Officer at the original assessment. The assessment order itself showed that the officer had considered the partition deed and had treated the house and shops as the subject of a partial partition, while no property income was included in the assessment. On these facts, the omission to return property income did not amount to failure to disclose material facts. The alleged admission in the later reply could not alter the true position when read as a whole.
Conclusion: The notice issued under section 147(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was without jurisdiction and was liable to be quashed.