Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount described as a reserve for doubtful debts was a reserve or a provision, and whether it was includible in the capital base for surtax under the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964.
Analysis: The distinction between a provision and a reserve depends on the nature and character of the amount, the purpose for which it is created, and the surrounding circumstances. A provision is made against a known or anticipated charge or liability and is excluded from capital computation, whereas a reserve is an appropriation out of profits. An account for doubtful debts, though nomenclaturally described as a reserve, is in substance a provision if it represents an evaluation of doubtful items and is set apart to meet their possible non-recovery. On the balance-sheet materials, the amount was built up by transfers tied to doubtful debts and was not shown to be a free reserve. Subsequent treatment of the account by the assessee did not alter its true character.
Conclusion: The amount was a provision and not a reserve, and it was not includible in the capital base for surtax.
Final Conclusion: The question referred was answered against the assessee, and the Department succeeded with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: For surtax capital computation, an amount set apart for doubtful debts is excluded if, in substance, it is a provision made to meet anticipated non-recovery and not an appropriation of surplus as a free reserve.