Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a deed executed by several persons could be refused registration in its entirety because one executant denied execution, and whether such registration could be treated as invalid so as to exclude the deed from evidence against the executants who admitted execution.
Analysis: The Registration Act, 1871 was read as a whole, including the provisions governing presentation for registration, inquiry by the registering officer, refusal to register, the evidentiary effect of registration, and the consequence of non-registration. The words in the refusal clause were construed distributively, so that refusal was confined to the person or persons denying execution or under disability, rather than destroying the operation of the deed against executants who admitted it. The Act was also treated as contemplating registration and re-registration in relation to different executants at different times, and as not permitting an otherwise valid registered instrument to be treated as a nullity merely because of an error in procedure by the registering officer.
Conclusion: The deed was not invalidated by the mother's denial of execution, and the registered instrument remained admissible and effective against the sons who admitted execution.