Modvat credit on stock transfers by book adjustment may be available when statutory transfer and duty-payment requirements are met.

Modvat credit could not be denied merely because stock transfers between sister units were made by advice note and book adjustment rather than by a sales invoice. The scheme was treated as a beneficial fiscal measure meant to prevent cascading duty, and the Rule 57G documentation requirement was read as evidence that goods moved and duty had been paid on inputs. Applying the definition of sale under Section 2(h) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the transfer could satisfy the statutory test in a multi-unit manufacturing arrangement. The appellants were therefore found to have a prima facie case, and the demand could not stand without examining the nature of the transfer.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on stock transfers between units merely because the goods moved by advice note and the transfer was effected through book adjustment rather than a sales invoice.

Analysis: The Modvat scheme was treated as a beneficial fiscal measure intended to avoid the cascading effect of duty. The relevant documentation under Rule 57G was considered to be meant to establish that goods had in fact moved from one unit to another and that duty had been paid on the inputs. The definition of sale under Section 2(h) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was applied to hold that a transfer supported by book adjustment could satisfy the requirement of sale in the multi-unit context, especially where the goods had been transferred between sister units for use in manufacture.

Conclusion: The appellants were held to have a prima facie case, and the demand could not be sustained without examining whether the stock transfers by book adjustment satisfied the statutory test.

---