Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether maintenance allowances received by a widow from the family estate were received by her as a member of a Hindu undivided family within the meaning of section 14(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, so as to be exempt from tax.
Analysis: The decisive question was the character of the receipt in the hands of the assessee, not the source from which the payment was made. The existence of an impartible estate did not, by itself, negative the widow's status as a member of the joint family or her right to maintenance from the holder of the estate. A will and codicil fixing the quantum of maintenance and creating a charge on the estate did not destroy the underlying right to receive maintenance as a family member. The allowance could therefore coexist with an additional contractual or testamentary basis without losing its character as family maintenance.
Conclusion: The maintenance allowances were received by the assessee as a member of a Hindu undivided family and were exempt under section 14(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and the allowance was held not liable to income tax.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under section 14(1), the material inquiry is whether the sum is received by the assessee in the capacity of a member of a Hindu undivided family; a testamentary provision fixing or securing the maintenance does not by itself alter that character.