Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether humidification plants installed in a spinning mill qualify as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for the purpose of Modvat credit.
Analysis: The definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q was construed as covering machinery used for process and production only where the item has a nexus with bringing about a change in the substance of the goods or inputs and participates directly in the manufacturing stream. The requirement that humidification may be technically necessary for maintaining ambient conditions and yarn quality was held insufficient by itself to bring the plant within the restrictive definition. On that reasoning, the claimed humidifiers were treated as providing atmosphere rather than directly processing or producing goods.
Conclusion: Humidification plants do not fall within capital goods under Rule 57Q on the facts considered, and the reference was dismissed against the assessee.