Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal overturns premature revision order, upholds Assessing Officer's decision, stresses substantial justice</h1> <h3>Bibhuti B. Dasgupta (HUF) Versus CIT-19, Jt. CIT-Range-19 (1), Mumbai</h3> Bibhuti B. Dasgupta (HUF) Versus CIT-19, Jt. CIT-Range-19 (1), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Breach of principles of natural justice in framing the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.2. Legality of revising the assessment order under section 263 of the Act.3. Determination of fair market value for computing capital gain tax liability.Issue 1: Breach of Principles of Natural Justice:The appeal by the assessee challenged the revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, asserting a breach of natural justice principles. The appellant argued that proper, sufficient, and effective opportunity of being heard was not provided before framing the order. The contention was that the order was bad and illegal due to this breach.Issue 2: Legality of Revision Order:The Assessing Officer (AO) had initially computed the Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) in the assessment order. However, the order was revised by the ld. CIT-19, directing further inquiry on the Fair Market Value of assets received or to be received. The appellant argued that the AO's order was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interest. Legal precedents were cited to support the argument that revision should not be invoked for every type of mistake.Issue 3: Determination of Fair Market Value:The dispute also involved the determination of fair market value for computing capital gain tax liability. The ld. CIT held that the fair market value of flats received should be considered as 'consideration,' not the cost of construction. The appellant contended that no such substitution was warranted based on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law.The appellant disclosed all information during the assessment proceedings, and the AO had conducted a full-fledged inquiry before passing the assessment order. The AO's decision was based on one of the possible views during the assessment, and it was argued that adopting an alternative method that could yield more revenue does not render the order erroneous. The appellant cited various legal decisions to support this argument.Moreover, the ld. CIT was precluded from revising the assessment order while the issue was pending before the ld. CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the ld. CIT should not have revised the order when the subject matter was under adjudication. The Tribunal also referenced legal provisions to support this conclusion.Additionally, the Tribunal noted that where two views were possible, and the AO had taken one view, the revision order by the ld. CIT could not be considered erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue's interest. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was accepted, and the impugned order passed by ld. CIT under section 263 was set aside.In another aspect, the Tribunal addressed the delay in filing the appeal and condoned it after considering the explanations provided by the appellant. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantial justice and decided to allow the appeal on merit after restoring it to the file of ld. CIT(A) for a fresh decision. The ld. CIT(A) was directed to grant a reasonable opportunity before passing the order on merit.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for both the issues discussed, emphasizing procedural fairness, legal principles, and the need for a thorough inquiry in tax assessment matters.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found