Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest could be awarded as part of restitution on money deposited in court pursuant to a conditional stay order, when the decree-holder did not withdraw the deposit because the condition of furnishing security was not complied with.
Analysis: Restitution under Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is intended to restore the parties to the position they would have occupied but for the erroneous decree, and the Court may direct interest, damages or other consequential relief where justice so requires. However, where the decree amount is deposited in court subject to a condition restricting withdrawal, and the decree-holder neither obtains nor uses the money because the condition is not fulfilled, there is no invariable rule that interest must be paid for the entire period of deposit. The entitlement depends on the circumstances of the case, the existence of any real benefit to the decree-holder, and whether the obstacle to withdrawal has been removed.
Conclusion: Interest was not payable on the deposited amount on the facts of the case, and the claim for interest was rejected in favour of the appellant.
Final Conclusion: Restitution was confined to the relief actually warranted by the circumstances, and the award of interest was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest as part of restitution is not automatic on a court deposit made under a conditional stay order; it becomes payable only when the circumstances show a real benefit to the decree-holder or when the obstacle to withdrawal has been removed, so that justice between the parties requires such payment.